Family Law Opinions
Child Support
Allen
and Allen (5/31/00)
(Modification)
Amiotte
v. Woods (1/30/02)
(Public Assistance)
Arand
and Arand (7/3/02)
Berry
and Berry (11/24/04)
Bleiler
and Bleiler (8/23/06)
Boss
and Boss (9/5/01)
(Jurisdiction)
Brant
and Brant (7/7/99)
(Contempt)
Cain
and Gilbert
(10/27/04) (Rebuttals to Presumptively Correct Amount)
Calvert
and Calvert (1/14/04)
(UIFSA)
Christiansen
and Christiansen (7/7/99)
(Modification)
Cohen
v. Powers (4/3/02)
Crocker
and Crocker (12/16/98)
(Constitutionality of Order to Support “Child Attending
School”) *
Crocker
and Crocker (4/26/01) (Constitutionality
of Order to Support “Child Attending School”) *
Crook
and Crook (Modification)
(4/20/05)
Deffenbacher
and Deffenbacher (6/7/00)
(Modification)
Dotson
and Dotson (10/31/01)
Garza
and Garza (7/31/05)
Gayer
and Gayer (2/20/98)
*
Glithero
and Glithero (1/8/98)
(Modification) *
Labuwi
and Labuwi (8/9/00)
(Modification)
Ledford
and Ledford (10/27/99)
(Arrearages)
Mallon
v. Cudahey (10/31/01)
(Enforcement of Foreign Order)
Mason
and Mason (4/28/04)
McGinley
and McGinley (2/28/01)
(“Child Attending School”)
Morrow
and Morrow (1/14/04)
(Garnishment)
Nibler
and Nibler (10/2/02)
(Modification)
Nieth
and
Nieth (4/27/05)
Nieth
and Nieth (7/13/05)
Niman
and Niman (6/7/06)
(Private School Tuition)
Norton
v. MacDonald (7/8/04)
(“Child
Attending School”)
O'Meara
and Cullick (7/13/05)
Pierce
and Pierce (7/5/06)
Redler
and Redler (3/3/00)
*
Schlitter
and Schlitter (6/12/03)
(Automatic Increase in Child Support Obligation)
Sorenson
v. Baker (9/15/99)
(Contempt)
State
ex
rel Dept.
of Human Resources v. Fairchild (4/14/99)
State
ex
rel Moran
v. Rushman (10/17/01)
(Paternity)
State
v.
Nuzman (8/4/04)
(Criminal Non-Support)
Thomsen
and Thomsen (5/10/00)
(Modification)
Van
Etten and Van Etten (3/31/99)
Van
Etten and Van Etten (1/13/99)
Waterman
and Waterman (2/10/99)
Wessels
and Wessels
(8/22/07) (Administrative Modification)
Wilson
and Wilson (2/19/03)
(Modification)
* Oregon Supreme Court Opinion